Whenever there is a shooting or a terrorist attack, Democrat lefties immediately seize on the tragedy, seemingly before the bodies are cleared, in order to ride their favorite political hobby horse of gun confiscation, or as they like to more gently refer to it, gun control. There seems to be a complete logic disconnect as they suggest that taking guns away from ordinary citizens is going to make everyone safer when the bad guys or the terrorists come to shoot them. How will unarmed citizens be safer under those circumstances?
There is, in fact, ample evidence that arming the public will do more to advance the safety of society than even a huge increase in police might would. Police cannot be everywhere at every moment, but an armed populace, especially one with hidden weapons, is a tremendous deterrent to bad guys since they have no idea who is armed or where they may be. And it certainly does not require arming every person in a crowd. The unknown factor of who might or might not be packing a nine millimeter pistol keeps the baddies guessing.
The evidence for this proposition is that most or all of the recent mass shootings have taken place in “gun free zones,” meaning zones designated to be free of guns. And they were, except for the bad guy or guys, who somehow missed the rule and so were able to mow down countless unarmed and defenseless citizens.
Another arrogant, anti-gun “progressive,” in this case a law professor by the name of David Cohen, has rushed to print anti-American propaganda in Rolling Stone magazine. While there may be as many as a dozen people who still actually read the magazine, it might still be instructive to broaden the reach of his musings and review some of the good professors points in this article.
Read anti-gun arguments on page 2:
The gun control argument is ignorant. Nothing short of 100% confiscation of all guns would solve anything. Of course that is the aim of the gun control advocates, to confiscate all guns and make them all 100% illegal. They just know that they cannot do that in one step. They are approaching total confiscation incrementally one tiny step at a time. Imagine someone taking very slow steps and slow actions with their hands to slowly grab the gun out of your hand (and you notice this). At what point are you going to slap the c**p out of them? I just prefer to slap the c**p out of them as soon as they take the first slow motion move towards my gun. I hope the rest of you do too.
How about you repeal your$#%&!@*to a socialist country. I hear venezuela is needing liberals.
Go$#%&!@*yourself asswipes go back to printing your magazine and keep your opinions to yourself dipshits
Last I checked there were enough states that want to clarify it and make it clear there should be fewer laws governing guns…..
Cnn is control by the Democrats…
2nd. Amendment is here to stay
Rolling stone would best be served as$#%&!@*paper
Ndalihet reklama
TIME FOR EVERYONE TO DROP ROLLING STONE MAG. !!!
Move to a country were they don’t have guns