If a white person were to say that Islamic views on Christians and Jews were barbaric and cruel, they would most-likely be called intolerant, racist (can that even be applied to religion?), or bigoted.
White people really can’t win any argument that involves race, sexuality, or religion. If somebody who practices Islam, on the other hand, were to express some views on Christians and Jews that seemed barbaric and cruel, not only would they not be reprimanded for it, but they would have a majority of liberal Americans agreeing with them.
Take Abu Ammaar Yasi Kazi for example. He’s not some crazy Islamist from the Middle East. He’s a college professor at Rhodes College in Memphis, TN. He’s also been described by the New York Times Magazine as one of the most “influential conservative clerics in American Islam”. Well how about you watch the video on the next page and make that decision for yourself. Apparently the liberal media is even changing the definition of the word “conservative”.
See the video on the next page.
Get out of our country you slimebag
Some rednecks gonna start shooting theses dumb fuckers
Unacceptable
Already banned, enforce the law! Public Law 414, Chapter 2, Section 212 The immigration and nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of people to the United States and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry or to stay in the US if the person belongs to an organization (Muslim/Islam) seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.” This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law was being ignored by the White House. Islamic immigration to the United States is prohibited under this law because the Quran, Sharia Law, and the Hadith oath all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the US Constitution, and to the republic. It is not a religion but a cult by its definition also. All Muslims who attest that the Quran is their life’s guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government, which goes against the United States Constitution – the law of the land. Now the political correct crowd say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial, because the law states that people who are affiliated with any “organization” that advocates the overthrow of our government at any level is prohibited. In addition, remember this when you contemplate converting: when you give oath to another country you are giving up, by choice, your American citizenship to an organization that wants you to overthrow your home country. The white house and Congress could stop this invasion / over throw in the USA …but who cares about some silly law, right? 911, Ft. Hood, Boston, Chattanooga, Arlington, San Bernardino, Orlando; Dallas, Texas; Idaho, Iowa, Michigan, Florida, and Milwaukee, and other recent attacks not listed.
Scumbag$#%&!@*pigs droppings!
SO CAN YOU
Send back to where he came from and his liberal friend s with him someone like this should not be teaching our kids.
Your a pig
well put those who want your refigees in first, leave those who oppose alone
They drink camel p**s straight from the source… And we’re dirty?