Albert N. Stubblebine III is a retired Major General in the U.S. Army and commanding general of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command.
When it comes to both speaking about and respecting the horrific tragedy that unfolded on 9/11, nobody is his parallel.
In this jaw-dropping interview, he shares exactly what he thinks really happened that day. And it’s not what you’ve been told.
His perspectives as an insider familiar with the military give a very different perspective than what played out on television screens across the world.
And why might you ask? Why is the man who dropped to his knees in horror that day, revisiting the narrative to say his piece on the truth?
Major General Stubblebine outlined the heartbreaking truth in an explosive interview that it is ludicrous for any intelligent military intelligence commander to take the official 9/11 narrative as a viable explanation for what occurred on Sept. 11th, 2011. And furthermore, that they do not.
More on the next page, and this official interview,
Just my opinion but why would this man, risk his life telling us his opinion? From what he’s saying a missile was fired into the buildings just before the planes crashed! It does give me pause to wonder what the Hell our government is hiding from us! Now that Iran and Boeing have been named for terroristic plots and bombings against Syria and Israel
JJ James The lowest temperature at which a plain carbon steel can begin to melt, its solidus, is 1,130 °C (2,070 °F). Steel never turns into a liquid below this temperature. Pure Iron (‘Steel’ with 0% Carbon) starts to melt at 1,492 °C (2,718 °F), and is completely liquid upon reaching 1,539 °C (2,802 °F).
This is stupid
F**k You!
And I have some ocean front property for sale cheap in SOuth Dakota
Brain Pena.. If one floor is designed to carry a certain load and that load doubles what do you think will happen ?? Its called pan caking. The next floor is now hit with 3 times it load limit and the load increases with every failure.
I have witnessed pan caking in New construction. The support for the forms were pulled to soon and the concrete wasn’t hardened enough. That floor collapsed on to the next floor. That floor couldn’t support the load and it collapsed and it was the same process for all four floors. 95% of the ruble stayed inside the building’s footprint.
The whole thing a Rumsfeld, Cheaney, Bush Deep State set up. World Trade Center came down and no plane hit it. I was an expert in Nam in demolitions and all of these buildings had Squibs visible
http://www.911censorship.com/twin%20towers%27%20demolition/squibs.html
JJ James i guess you haven’t seen the experiments with her fuel in a pit with the very same size steel beams in the WTC laying across the pit about 3 foot above the JP5. It only took 30 mins to heat the steel beam to the point of failure. The beam started sagging in the middle. This was done outside in the open. The fuel wasn’t atomized either. The steel didn’t have to melt. It only needed to fail to support the load. Which it did. The fire protect that was sprayed onto the steel wasn’t done when the building was erected. A spinkler system was the required protection. The fire resistance coating on the beams was applied later on during the life of the building. No when those planes hit. I am sure the impact knocked off a far amount of that protection. 1inch= 1 hour of protection. Most structures apply only 2-3 inches today.
One of my neighbors was on the plane that slammed into the Pentagon. You assholes! Do you want me to go next door and tell his wife that her deceased husband is actually alive and well in an abandoned FEMA camp somewhere? Assholes.
Michael Turner