“I can’t imagine any use for bayonets in an urban setting,” stated Sen. Rand Paul to Senate Homeland Security Committee at a hearing last year.
“I can’t answer what a local police force would use a bayonet for,” Alan Estevez said.
Paul snapped back “None”
Rand Paul is completely correct, of course, that there is no need for bayonets in local law enforcement. Bayonets are for hand-to-hand combat in battle and the only purpose is to kill.
GO TO PAGE 2 FOR MORE + VIDEO:
Damn good question.
YES WHY?
they could really have used some in baltimore
To feel like they are in the Army and preparing for war.
So ^^^Idiot^^^ Cowards^^^ can feel safe.
It’s been a hot minute since Americans have done a bayonet charge.
??????????!
They do not need bayonets on the police force. They also do not need fully automatic weapons
Ah, well, “To protect and serve” don’t you know…
paul what idiot thinks you would make a good president?
Two tours in Marine Corps and only used them in bootcamp , there is no need for bayonet’s in police force in America !