“I can’t imagine any use for bayonets in an urban setting,” stated Sen. Rand Paul to Senate Homeland Security Committee at a hearing last year.
“I can’t answer what a local police force would use a bayonet for,” Alan Estevez said.
Paul snapped back “None”
Rand Paul is completely correct, of course, that there is no need for bayonets in local law enforcement. Bayonets are for hand-to-hand combat in battle and the only purpose is to kill.
GO TO PAGE 2 FOR MORE + VIDEO:
It seems congress is totally out of loop and not running the USA. Congress see stuff , ask no questions, and hides
aka “None of Ur Bizness”. Wow you are dumb fucking$#%&!@*that needs to be skull fucked upon the Apocalypse. ….And I will be the happy thruster to your throat. However…..I do believe you will enjoy it.
John McGann c’mon….lemme tickle your Tonsils.
Muslims weapon of choice is the sword…
There are enough citizen snipers(hunters), we’ll never get to hand-to-hand with cops or American military if the balloon goes up. We’ll win in 72 hours. Barack & Killary know it, which is why they want our guns
First one that knows why.
hey being fair is fair. necessity is the argument of tyrants. if i can have a bayonet so can any other man.
I’M SURE THEY ARE FOR THE POLICE THAT WILL HELP OBUMMER IF HE TRIES TO CONTROL WITH MARSHALL LAW~~~~~
not yet but comming soon to home near you
Trench warfare, once you run out of ammo.