“I can’t imagine any use for bayonets in an urban setting,” stated Sen. Rand Paul to Senate Homeland Security Committee at a hearing last year.
“I can’t answer what a local police force would use a bayonet for,” Alan Estevez said.
Paul snapped back “None”
Rand Paul is completely correct, of course, that there is no need for bayonets in local law enforcement. Bayonets are for hand-to-hand combat in battle and the only purpose is to kill.
GO TO PAGE 2 FOR MORE + VIDEO:
But the pic is Military not Police my guess and some X DOD with PTSD working for the Police Dept buying AR attachments …It warrents a 2nd look 4 sure …
The same reason we need the judge. 45 cal 410 shot round.
For the riots
They Absolutely “Do Not” need Bayonets for anything!!
they don.t @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@2
I can tell you, with experience, the bayonet is NOT necessary.
Maybe you’ll have a bayonet stuck up your$#%&!@*by a fat assed doughnut eating tax parasite.
John McGann uhhh. you said “u”. Are you fucking kidding me on the correction of spelling. PLEASE, re-read your post, you ignorant$#%&!@*
Just another military weapon (this one for hand to hand combat) that police can have but citizens need to register. If a cop needs a bayonet, he needs range time even more.
And we will need those vets more than anything else. Who better to lead us!