“I can’t imagine any use for bayonets in an urban setting,” stated Sen. Rand Paul to Senate Homeland Security Committee at a hearing last year.
“I can’t answer what a local police force would use a bayonet for,” Alan Estevez said.
Paul snapped back “None”
Rand Paul is completely correct, of course, that there is no need for bayonets in local law enforcement. Bayonets are for hand-to-hand combat in battle and the only purpose is to kill.
GO TO PAGE 2 FOR MORE + VIDEO:
Lol
It’s for the AMERICAN CITIZENS…THEY HAVEN’T SEEN OR CAUGHT ANY TERRORIST YET.
That is strange
Liberals
Well, police defenders?
For whom?
Well, Rand, I suggest that you suit up and spend some time on the police force of a big city. Maybe you can give a report as to why or why not they need them, based on actual experience.
Do them no good with a bullet between the eyes
Friend, don’t get me wrong. I’m glad for ya but this might cause you problems from the anti gun/bayonet crowd (at least for no bayonet for you and me!) in govt/ law enforcement.
I hope not but, it is something to consider.
Riot control
For when Obama claims Martial Law and the killing of all born again believers who don’t believe the way the Muslims do.