“I can’t imagine any use for bayonets in an urban setting,” stated Sen. Rand Paul to Senate Homeland Security Committee at a hearing last year.
“I can’t answer what a local police force would use a bayonet for,” Alan Estevez said.
Paul snapped back “None”
Rand Paul is completely correct, of course, that there is no need for bayonets in local law enforcement. Bayonets are for hand-to-hand combat in battle and the only purpose is to kill.
GO TO PAGE 2 FOR MORE + VIDEO:
Conspiracy to kill AMERICANS
Someone … TELL THIS MORON RAND PAUL … THEY WILL NEED EVERYTHING POSSIBLE … TO PROTECT THEMSELVES … When The … ISLAMIC DOGS … ARE UN-LEASHED … IN OUR COUNTRY ! https://www.facebook.com/dan.metcalf2
to prod the thugs away
Again, it’s all in the situation. If they have their life threatened, I don’t see why they should only be trying to incapacitate someone, that makes no logical sense. Secondly, over 95% or LE aren’t in those situations to begin with, the shootouts and killings are rare but they’re blown out of proportion.
If they are being charged at, that probably means the aggressor doesn’t have a gun. Im not sure it’s blown out of proportion, there may be some straw mans running around, but the deaths by police officer numbers continue to rise, and it’s not really debatable that done of those deaths could, and should have been avoided.
Thugs
for when they run out of bullets in the coming insurgency
Close combat
We’re arguing semantics I believe. Maybe they have a weapon, possibly not. I’m saying I don’t see anything wrong with them having another weapon as long as they use EOF and know what to do in the situation. Nothing is foolproof
These weapons are for husssein the scoialist muslim terrorist SS troops when he gets ready to make his run to overtake the USA.