“I can’t imagine any use for bayonets in an urban setting,” stated Sen. Rand Paul to Senate Homeland Security Committee at a hearing last year.
“I can’t answer what a local police force would use a bayonet for,” Alan Estevez said.
Paul snapped back “None”
Rand Paul is completely correct, of course, that there is no need for bayonets in local law enforcement. Bayonets are for hand-to-hand combat in battle and the only purpose is to kill.
GO TO PAGE 2 FOR MORE + VIDEO:
Rand Paul is turning out to be an idiot….
The bayonet is super intimidating,
Excuse me while I take a big obama and wipe my rand paul.
I think with all the unusual item that have been given to local police and so so many questions that were not answered with straight answer anyway either we get this government out of the peoples white house and get new representatives or by god tell us what is this all about because from what I have found is nothing short of stealing we the American peoples tax dollars and not a little at a time either and still no answers to the questions asked plus when a government sets a law or order such as martial law and then he does things to provolk a situation as to give him justification to sign In martial law that tells anyone this is not anything good for the American and should be put at a stop ASAP but NO you people let him go on and on to the point of distruction of our country and people I do not think the Obama administration are fit to run a childs lemonade stand much less the USA
Good one Matt !!!
OBAMA IS DESTROYING OUR SECURITY BAYONETS FOR RADICAL HEAD HUNTERS
A bayonet is for standing someone. Why the question.
No
this whole country is becomein a police state
Why do need armed guys around you ?