“I can’t imagine any use for bayonets in an urban setting,” stated Sen. Rand Paul to Senate Homeland Security Committee at a hearing last year.
“I can’t answer what a local police force would use a bayonet for,” Alan Estevez said.
Paul snapped back “None”
Rand Paul is completely correct, of course, that there is no need for bayonets in local law enforcement. Bayonets are for hand-to-hand combat in battle and the only purpose is to kill.
GO TO PAGE 2 FOR MORE + VIDEO:
A bayonet would come useful if there are a attack from ISIS OR BLM, AND POLICE DON’T WANT TO GIVE THERE POSITIONS AWAY AND ONE OF THEM WERE ABOUT TO SHOOT SOMEONE, USE THE BAYONET.
IF YOU LIBERALS THAT ARE HELPING OBAMA DESTROY AMERICA HAD ANY COMMON SENSE, IT WOULD OF BEEN EASY TO FIGURE OUT
Baton, tazer, buttstroke with your rifle, mace, cs gas.. The list goes on.
NOT good.
They don’t need them just like they don’t need military up-armored vehicles.
they don’t need bayonets obsolete tool in my book.
Simple, Military and police Will use every means to kill for the gov. when new gov. is established, they will then kill all the military and police that made their victory possible, violently and viciously. Same old song
obama ,and holder requested this type of training for police—poison to american citizens
Probably to contain us poor slob citizens when he enacts Martial Law! Think about that for a minute!
Another reason Obama is importing so many able bodied men from Syria (?)
Maybe that’s the problem. Thugs SHOULD be killed!