“I can’t imagine any use for bayonets in an urban setting,” stated Sen. Rand Paul to Senate Homeland Security Committee at a hearing last year.
“I can’t answer what a local police force would use a bayonet for,” Alan Estevez said.
Paul snapped back “None”
Rand Paul is completely correct, of course, that there is no need for bayonets in local law enforcement. Bayonets are for hand-to-hand combat in battle and the only purpose is to kill.
GO TO PAGE 2 FOR MORE + VIDEO:
Remember Obama wanted a police force as big and powerful as the military. Look at all billions spent on ammo ,guns and ready made meals etc. And it’s my understanding they are doing it again. Ask yourself why!!!
Excellent question.. Why??
good question ? why do peace officers need fully automatic ($#%&!@*ault) rifles for?
They don’t. Until their is Civil War,there’s no need for police to have much of what they have these days. The National Guard doesn’t even have some of the equipment the police have. Very few citizens have leaned to heavy weapons to justify police in having them. This is a result of Clinton putting all law enforcement under charge/extension of the IRS. When he asked Army and Marines to do a door to door disarming of citizens, they said NO! Then put police under the IRS,the secondary military. Any way it goes,the citizens outnumber “them” and no plan of oppressive change is going to last. The ways before the 1700s are gone forever and they need not learn the hard lesson that they will not return.
WTF?
Cuz then they cant het in trouble for shooting!!! Thats a no brainer
this would not be the first time in US history they saved money on bullets to kill unarmed innocent people
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10153155699362054&set=a.10150990303497054.427684.550122053&type=1
they can kill old folks… the young ones are smart enough to sit in wait for a clean head shot to that stupid law enforcement that follows obama’s lawless rules…
To behead the muslim army and ISIS