“I can’t imagine any use for bayonets in an urban setting,” stated Sen. Rand Paul to Senate Homeland Security Committee at a hearing last year.
“I can’t answer what a local police force would use a bayonet for,” Alan Estevez said.
Paul snapped back “None”
Rand Paul is completely correct, of course, that there is no need for bayonets in local law enforcement. Bayonets are for hand-to-hand combat in battle and the only purpose is to kill.
GO TO PAGE 2 FOR MORE + VIDEO:
i don’t know of a lot of police depts with bayonets……
They had better be used to ” PROTECT” American citizens.
They are on the DHS / FEMA grant giveaway list just before where they list MRAP’s as personal protective equipment …
The better to stab us quietly
For drill, for preparing for action, in real life, it is a conditioning, to kill with dagger, their is animal force too included into it, bullet is simply ‘a rational negative’.
For when water and food are no longer accessible.
Ummmm because its to use them during the race war.
@[593366379:2048:Dana Lynn Armstrong]
Cause you never know when they raid that cookout, they may need to cut some meat
OK, I’ll bite: “What does local police need bayonets for? Imagine pig stickingg. Same goes for “WHY DO Local Police need Bayonets? Anyone see the difference, or has common core gone further?