“I can’t imagine any use for bayonets in an urban setting,” stated Sen. Rand Paul to Senate Homeland Security Committee at a hearing last year.
“I can’t answer what a local police force would use a bayonet for,” Alan Estevez said.
Paul snapped back “None”
Rand Paul is completely correct, of course, that there is no need for bayonets in local law enforcement. Bayonets are for hand-to-hand combat in battle and the only purpose is to kill.
GO TO PAGE 2 FOR MORE + VIDEO:
Stick a pig with!!!!
11?
Look who is in charge of DHS and you will know why he wants it legal for police to use bayonets. It is part of the discipline in Tribunals….let’s start lopping heads and hands of those who offend our beliefs….any of this sound like Sharia Law incon$#%&!@*uously creeping into America? I apologize for being so blunt, but people really need to wake up and smell the coffee.
The militarization of the police…!!
Blacks are helping this come about for there lack of knowledge…!!
A defensive firearm has a larger effective range than a bayonet.
They don’t, it is excessive militarization, what next mortars,perhaps some artillery ?
Let’s give our MILITARY back their WEAPONS
Whoever made the law to disarm them make a huge mistake. If u no. Let me no. Thanks
To heard you Sheepeople into the FEMA camps….
This is true. We are not free anymore. Only a matter of time