“I can’t imagine any use for bayonets in an urban setting,” stated Sen. Rand Paul to Senate Homeland Security Committee at a hearing last year.
“I can’t answer what a local police force would use a bayonet for,” Alan Estevez said.
Paul snapped back “None”
Rand Paul is completely correct, of course, that there is no need for bayonets in local law enforcement. Bayonets are for hand-to-hand combat in battle and the only purpose is to kill.
GO TO PAGE 2 FOR MORE + VIDEO:
He would too if it got him elected.
In case they run out of ammo. Duh
Why not?
Im ready…come $#%&!@* it now
They don’t.
I agree with Paul here.
Police use sidearms,tasers,batons,body cameras,tear gas,sheilds,etc.etc….. call the national guard before it’s that bad..if they need military weapons that bayonets attach to???? In preparation for “hand to hand ” combat with bayonets???What does that say? ??maybe the gov. Will do away with a well regulated militia altogether with well armed and regulated police forces.
Does make you wonder.
They are the new form of $#%&!@*s S.S..Curtousy of the empoer Obama
Cheaper and very quiet