In a recent speech directed at the United States, Vladimir Putin stated that World War III is inevitable and will be started by the U.S.
In no uncertain terms Putin blames America for destroying the ‘global collective security’ and American imperialism will cause the world to go to war.
SEE PAGE 2 FOR MORE:
Martial Law…umm look up Operation Jade Helm.
They are already preparing for it.
Send Obama and all Liberals to fight to the death… arm them with water ballons…
Red Dawn!!!!!
Bingo!!!!
WWII wasn’t because of an economic collapse either. If anything Germany was building up despite the treaty of Versailles. Japan is the only one who was having economic decline but only because of the US oil embargo which was caused by japan’s aggressive expansion in China and SE Asia.
@[100006560461532:2048:Mely Tang] the red horse “will tear peace from the earth”
Aaron…here is a micro-lesson to what you proposing. You state talking and reasoning through their conflicts. You clearly have a point of view and clearly you are open to the idea of sharing your point of view. Naturally some people will disagree and discuss why they disagree. Now…..have you ever been able to convince people to share your point of view? Has anyone ever convinced you to share their point of view? At any time we can look at discussions like this and see multiple points of view and the banter and sometimes negatively venomous exchanges but does anything ever get resolved? No and the reason for that is simple. We each view life through our own perspective and if we believe something to be true we will defend it. Unfortunately if someone disagrees and has a differing point of view they will also defend it. Unless you can change someones perspective, which rarely happens, you end in a verbal stalemate. In the political and global arena a compromise between powers is just that … a compromise. Neither side has actually changed the point of view or perspective of the other but have merely found just enough common ground to cease the debate process. Over time ideals and perspectives change and then we see old compromises come undone because there is once again too much of a divide and not enough common ground to keep the old compromise together.
Yes, I have been able to persuade people to see the validity of my point of view. In conflict resolution it seems though there are two types of learners out there. The first, and much more desired, is the one who can be spoken with, can be reasoned with. Words with that type chosen precisely, and carefully full resolution can be achieved without bloodshed.
Putin unfortunately is in a second category, and that type is much less desirable. That type understands only one thing, and that is getting beaten badly. He will not come willingly to a negotiation table. He will fight well beyond the point he was beaten and anyone else would have quit. He will be filled with spite and anger, and absolutely looking for payback through any tool he can achieve it. His type is dangerous, but bloodshed doesn’t need to happen. There are a variety of diplomatic tools that can be used to force his hand.
$#%&!@* was also the second type, and sometimes brutal combat is going to happen to stop men like that. To suggest armed horrific war is the only answer, is suggesting a limited intellect capable of the most basic thoughts. People can live in peace with each other. I won’t suggest peace and harmony, but peace can happen.
After briefly viewing the 2015 MTV music awards, war sounds like a perfect idea. The gene pool needs to be drained.
Putin, PLEASE shoot the White House