Over the past eight years, Barack Obama has transformed the justice department into a liberal activist branch of the federal government. Now, they’re not even trying to hide their political leanings.
Earlier this week, Donald Trump nominated a young constitutionalist judge to the Supreme Court. His pick, Neil Gorsuch, is so uncontroversial that even Rachel Maddow called him “relatively mainstream.” When Gorsuch was nominated to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2006, he was confirmed by unanimous voice vote.
But that doesn’t mean the Democrats aren’t feigning outrage. Mere moments after Gorsuch’s Supreme Court nomination, many Democrat senators vowed to block his nomination on the grounds that he is too conservative to serve impartially.
Meanwhile, those same Democrats don’t seem to be troubled that lower courts are being controlled by leftist jurists that wear their progressive activism with pride. One such judge was recently spotted wearing the Women’s Day March “pussy hat” in her Texas courtroom.
Read about the potential consequences that judge may face on the next page:
They have no business on the bench. Personal or political agendas are not how you rule, they have to rule by constitution and by rule of law. There are many judges like this that should be removed. Many judges are lawyers that were no go and couldn’t make a living at it so went to the bench.
Couldn’t take her seriously and is a mocory of the court.
Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for you are with me; your rod and your staff, they comfort m
She looks like a total idiot. Most elected officials are.
How did she ever become a judge?
She is suppose to set an example to be impartial in all her dealings and personal beliefs, what I have come to believe is that female liberals serving in a leadership public role take it to extrems to include abusing their power, for example in my divorce for division of property the court appointed a female mediator, she told me that she was only there to mediate and had to be impartial on both sides, after the mediator came up with a mutual agreement between my wife and my self on division of property, she turned around and told my wife that she should go for more spousal maints after we had already agreed to the settlement, well needless to say I blew up and I blew up hard and fast this snowflake die hard liberal did not know who she was dealing with, she said you don’t need to get upset, I said the hell I dont, I said you are suppose to be impartial, but yet you are siding with my ex wife trying to get every dime you can, now if you wanted more spousal maints you should have never signed the agreement. Needless to say the snowflake liberal backed down
Isn’t it a conflict of interest if you take a side? Being a judge ?
Dum bitch
What a$#%&!@*how could anybody take her serious This shift has gone to far!
Water balloons can get past the metal scanners. Take 10 balloons and fill em up in the bath room. On a 10 count everyone toss a couple and this nerdy gurdy would have a wet$#%&!@*hat and might make an apology.