Receiving a pardon is no doubt something that a person would receive with joy and gratitude. However, there can be a problem: Accepting a pardon does imply that you committed the crime for which you are being pardoned, right? If there were no crime committed, then the pardon wouldn’t make any sense.
Such is the problem in which Mrs. Clinton might well find herself. That she has another potential legal issue to contend with is certainly no surprise. In would be interesting to see just how much money the Clintons or their supporters have spent defending them all these decades. The figure must be staggering.
So with Obama in the waning days of his presidency handing out pardons with wild abandon, what of Hillary? More on page two.
So , she’s guilty
I think this is called a Catch-22.
But she says she never broke the law so what would she be pardoned for?
If she isnt guilty why,does she need to be pardon it just shows obana us just as guilty as she us
What pardon tho??? Has she been convicted of any thing yet?
See who she looks like here only white. ?
Lynch
If she can get pardoned without charge, so can snowden.
Its fact the Demacrats can’t face the truth that there leadership Are criminals. From Obama on down. The whole load of them are all corrupt. The best thing that cold happen to the Demacrat party is to let the criminal investigations clean it up. And build trust again. People now see this party for what it is. Crime bosses running the party.
If you need a pardon, you must be guilty!