Receiving a pardon is no doubt something that a person would receive with joy and gratitude. However, there can be a problem: Accepting a pardon does imply that you committed the crime for which you are being pardoned, right? If there were no crime committed, then the pardon wouldn’t make any sense.
Such is the problem in which Mrs. Clinton might well find herself. That she has another potential legal issue to contend with is certainly no surprise. In would be interesting to see just how much money the Clintons or their supporters have spent defending them all these decades. The figure must be staggering.
So with Obama in the waning days of his presidency handing out pardons with wild abandon, what of Hillary? More on page two.
Pardon…for what the witch is innocent….right??
She has to charged. Proasacted and covicted first. This is not Russia where a dictator can just through his political foes in prison . Last I knew trump was not declared dictator. President Obama CAN NOT PARDON HER. do any of you have clue hoe due prosses wotks. Or the US constitution for that matter? So many things you are demanding are unconstitutional.
it would also mean… she should have went to JAIL but didn’t… and it would make you wonder WHY she wasn’t…but WE already Know WHY… a Pardon will just prove.. SOME AMERICANS ARE above the LAW… But we already know that too… Just ask Bradly Manning
She has not been indicted…but soon we hope right? After the Muslim is out of office.
Yes. I’m right there with you!
Nixon was never charged and he was pardond
F**e news… He can’t pardon someone who hasn’t been convicted yet… When she is convicted, I don’t see President Trump pardoning her. Do you?
There is a kid serving time for taking pictures of an old. Submarine! IF HILLARY DOESN’T HAVE TO FACE THE MUSIC, WE WILL BE THE LAUGHING STOCK OF THE ENTIRE WORLD!
Bill Lozier, YOUR paragraph is barely readable and your SMUGGLY lecturing us about ” due process?
Obama must really think he’s somebody