Receiving a pardon is no doubt something that a person would receive with joy and gratitude. However, there can be a problem: Accepting a pardon does imply that you committed the crime for which you are being pardoned, right? If there were no crime committed, then the pardon wouldn’t make any sense.
Such is the problem in which Mrs. Clinton might well find herself. That she has another potential legal issue to contend with is certainly no surprise. In would be interesting to see just how much money the Clintons or their supporters have spent defending them all these decades. The figure must be staggering.
So with Obama in the waning days of his presidency handing out pardons with wild abandon, what of Hillary? More on page two.
She has not been convicted of a crime yet, so why would HiLIARy need a pardon???
The problem with Hillary accepting a pardon from Obama is….she has to be charged with a damn crime first.!!! Click bate
Marcus L. Perkins Sr. That is true. That is why Trey Gowdy is not arresting them yet! Not until Trump gets in to the Oval office.
Why should she get a pardon if she has done nothing wrong? According to her and Obama it is everyone elses fault!
MUST BE INDICTED FIRST…
That$#%&!@*should be hanging from a tree
You know I’m not a collage gaduate but THERE IS NO SUCH THANG, pardon someone who has committed no crime, DUH
Both should face public hanging
Obama can issue a blanket pardon to Hillary for her time as Secretary of State or for anything after she left office wither she has been charged or not and it cannot be revoked by another president but to grant her a pardon would seem to me as a means to cover her guilt
This is why it’s better of she’s not charged until AFTER Trump is sworn in.