Receiving a pardon is no doubt something that a person would receive with joy and gratitude. However, there can be a problem: Accepting a pardon does imply that you committed the crime for which you are being pardoned, right? If there were no crime committed, then the pardon wouldn’t make any sense.
Such is the problem in which Mrs. Clinton might well find herself. That she has another potential legal issue to contend with is certainly no surprise. In would be interesting to see just how much money the Clintons or their supporters have spent defending them all these decades. The figure must be staggering.
So with Obama in the waning days of his presidency handing out pardons with wild abandon, what of Hillary? More on page two.
And if he does doesn’t that make him an accessary to the crime?
LOCK HER UP!!!…LOCK HER UP!!!!…HILLARY FOR PRISON NOW!!!!…IT MUST BE PROVEN TO ALL THAT NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW IN OUR AMERICA!!!….HILLARY’S CORRUPTION WILL NEVER STOP TILL SHE IS BEHIND BARS!!!!!………TRUMP IS THE PRESIDENT AMERICA DESERVES!!!….GOD BLESS OUR NEW PRESIDENT!!!!.
Pardon for what? I thought she was innocent
Hell no..
But she’s innocent…..ah hahahaha
she’s been exonerated twice-no need for a pardon-maybe an apology
pardon would some how say I’m guilty
Justice! Killary prison
How can you pardon someone who has not been charged?
First of all she has to be convicted, or at least recently sentenced, to be pardoned. And, isn’t accepting a pardon an indirect admission that you are guilty? She, being pathological, does not think she has done anything wrong and is totally in denial.