Receiving a pardon is no doubt something that a person would receive with joy and gratitude. However, there can be a problem: Accepting a pardon does imply that you committed the crime for which you are being pardoned, right? If there were no crime committed, then the pardon wouldn’t make any sense.
Such is the problem in which Mrs. Clinton might well find herself. That she has another potential legal issue to contend with is certainly no surprise. In would be interesting to see just how much money the Clintons or their supporters have spent defending them all these decades. The figure must be staggering.
So with Obama in the waning days of his presidency handing out pardons with wild abandon, what of Hillary? More on page two.
F**k them both!
No worry. No charges no pardon o bam a . 21 days
Yes she can be sued.. Pardons don’t relinquish that. Benghazi families get in line.
Actually he can give her a blank pardon. Nixon received a blank pardon.
No he cant pardon her for future crimes.
Carissa Richmond Furtado: Nixon resigned before he was impeached or convicted of approving Watergate spying. I may be wrong though.
He can pardon her wt a blanket pardon. Ford pardoned Nixon and he wasn’t charged.
He can give her a blank pardon. You dont have to be charged wt a crime
Wrong Ford gave Nixon a blank pardon and he was never charged.
There is a very wide latitude the president is giving. so very possibly, because they’re looking at pardoning Snowden and he’s supposed to have been treasonous.