Receiving a pardon is no doubt something that a person would receive with joy and gratitude. However, there can be a problem: Accepting a pardon does imply that you committed the crime for which you are being pardoned, right? If there were no crime committed, then the pardon wouldn’t make any sense.
Such is the problem in which Mrs. Clinton might well find herself. That she has another potential legal issue to contend with is certainly no surprise. In would be interesting to see just how much money the Clintons or their supporters have spent defending them all these decades. The figure must be staggering.
So with Obama in the waning days of his presidency handing out pardons with wild abandon, what of Hillary? More on page two.
He can’t pardon her IF she’s not found guilty of a crime.
I mean, we ALL know she’s guilty as sin but is above the law.
evil pardoning evil.. interesting concept for sure
In the end, they both will fall…..
Proves she’s guilty. Opens up Civil Suits.
can’t pardon someone not convicted of a crime….
THE ONLY PARDON SHOULD BE FOR THE FART SHE GAVE ON STAGE AT THE PRIMARIES !!!
Pardon? Is that what they call committal papers?
No pardon for this$#%&!@*
Seems she would actually need to be charged with something before she could be pardoned. If there is no charge what is the pardon for?
Seems she would actually need to be charged with something before she could be pardoned. If there is no charge what is the pardon for?