Receiving a pardon is no doubt something that a person would receive with joy and gratitude. However, there can be a problem: Accepting a pardon does imply that you committed the crime for which you are being pardoned, right? If there were no crime committed, then the pardon wouldn’t make any sense.
Such is the problem in which Mrs. Clinton might well find herself. That she has another potential legal issue to contend with is certainly no surprise. In would be interesting to see just how much money the Clintons or their supporters have spent defending them all these decades. The figure must be staggering.
So with Obama in the waning days of his presidency handing out pardons with wild abandon, what of Hillary? More on page two.
Don’t you have to be proven guilty in court before you can be pardoned…..?
No she doesn’t he can pardon her for any crime she ever committed, or may have committed, or any future crime if it is connected even remotely to prior crime
The$#%&!@*is going to hit the fan when Trump is sworn in. I can’t wait!!!! Corruption is going down!!!!
The investigations could be many,he won’t even know what to pardon her for..
I am now convinced
How can she be pardoned when she has not been charged with anything.
She won’t live long enough to worry about it.
We all know she is guilty…the thing is, so is he. And if we act against obama he’s toast and she loses…then the only way out for clinton is to rat him out for a deal. What would Trey Gowdy do at that point…build his case against them both and cook both in the same vat.
Is that she doesn’t need one.
True.