Receiving a pardon is no doubt something that a person would receive with joy and gratitude. However, there can be a problem: Accepting a pardon does imply that you committed the crime for which you are being pardoned, right? If there were no crime committed, then the pardon wouldn’t make any sense.
Such is the problem in which Mrs. Clinton might well find herself. That she has another potential legal issue to contend with is certainly no surprise. In would be interesting to see just how much money the Clintons or their supporters have spent defending them all these decades. The figure must be staggering.
So with Obama in the waning days of his presidency handing out pardons with wild abandon, what of Hillary? More on page two.
Nice little conundrum, eh?
TIME TO PUT THE BABY DOWN… Dear president elect…Hillary is like the 2 year old you put in the crib, then she crawls out and smears the$#%&!@*from her diaper on the walls during a dinner party screaming it’s not my bed time over and over again… Mr Trump, please put the baby to bed once and for all in the form of a special prosecutor or else the baby will continue to climb out of the crib and ruin the dinner party with her$#%&!@*filled democratic diaper… Sincerely, The Deplorables.
Let’s just wait and not pardon any of them. Even a President cannot pardon Treason.
Indictment or conviction is not a prerequisite for a pardon.
Now he’s got standards
They both have classified email private servers and need to be in adjoining jail cells so they can stare at each for decades.
No pardons!
If she has not been charged with anything she can’t be pardoned for anything that’s why I say nobody should charge her until Trump takes office
how can he pardon her when she hasn’t been charged
How can you issue a pardon if no charges