Receiving a pardon is no doubt something that a person would receive with joy and gratitude. However, there can be a problem: Accepting a pardon does imply that you committed the crime for which you are being pardoned, right? If there were no crime committed, then the pardon wouldn’t make any sense.
Such is the problem in which Mrs. Clinton might well find herself. That she has another potential legal issue to contend with is certainly no surprise. In would be interesting to see just how much money the Clintons or their supporters have spent defending them all these decades. The figure must be staggering.
So with Obama in the waning days of his presidency handing out pardons with wild abandon, what of Hillary? More on page two.
We were all under the assumption from the DOJ that she had done nothing wrong…….which is it……FML……Rob K
Well, well. If she gets pardon, that is admission of guilt….interesting
Killary the anti-American communist muslim loving whore!
HE’S NOT OUR LEGAL PRESIDENT CAN’T SEAL RECORDS /BIRTH CERTIFICATE F**E /HE’S NOTHING BUT A FRAUD
I’ve said this all along. It’s a delightful conundrum. What the hell could Obama possibly pardon the lying$#%&!@*for, since she hasn’t been convicted of a crime?
YET!!!!!
Obama is just as big of a scum bag!
She has not been convicted of any thing yet.
Plead guilty! You know you are!!
She can be pardoned. The precedent was set when Ford pardoned Nixon after he resigned. Nixon resigned before criminal charges were filed. He was undergoing impeachment hearings, but resigned before the vote in part because Republicans in the house informed him he should resign or they would vote for impeachment.
If she accepted the pardon she is admitting guilt, would that make her ineligible to run for federal office?