Receiving a pardon is no doubt something that a person would receive with joy and gratitude. However, there can be a problem: Accepting a pardon does imply that you committed the crime for which you are being pardoned, right? If there were no crime committed, then the pardon wouldn’t make any sense.
Such is the problem in which Mrs. Clinton might well find herself. That she has another potential legal issue to contend with is certainly no surprise. In would be interesting to see just how much money the Clintons or their supporters have spent defending them all these decades. The figure must be staggering.
So with Obama in the waning days of his presidency handing out pardons with wild abandon, what of Hillary? More on page two.
The word is “you’re”. I asked a simple question, do you have an answer or not?
She(they) will get what’s comin”
she has to be convicted then she is a felon
If she accepts a pardon she’ll be admitting that she’s a crook and that she really did lie to America !
She can’t remember
they need to wait until obama is out of office to charge her then obama has nothing to pardon her for. charge her after jan 20
She’s small potatoes to Obama now why should he pardon her
Theres a couple problems with obama pardoning clinton, that apparently this story didnt want to bring up.
First, hillary is obamas sacraficial lamb,if he pardons her then trumps AG has to first prove obama was inelligable to be president to begin with.
Second, this would open up everyone who covered up his crime too prosecution as well, and once its been proven everything hes done and accomplished for them will be nullified.
So you see he cant pardon her without destroying himself.
Unless of course he can get trump on board with his friends, The Order.
She would be admitting the truth… guilty !
Bet the shredders and black ink have been busy since November 9th