Receiving a pardon is no doubt something that a person would receive with joy and gratitude. However, there can be a problem: Accepting a pardon does imply that you committed the crime for which you are being pardoned, right? If there were no crime committed, then the pardon wouldn’t make any sense.
Such is the problem in which Mrs. Clinton might well find herself. That she has another potential legal issue to contend with is certainly no surprise. In would be interesting to see just how much money the Clintons or their supporters have spent defending them all these decades. The figure must be staggering.
So with Obama in the waning days of his presidency handing out pardons with wild abandon, what of Hillary? More on page two.
He CAN’T “pardon” her. She has not been convicted of anything, even though we all know she’s guilty as hell of many crimes. She should just be ignored until Trump takes office and Ojerkface is gone, and then let a new attorney general prosecute her to the fullest extent of the law. Then, when she is convicted, no one will be around to “pardon” her.
There can be no pardon because she has not been legally charged with a crime…..
Shes going to Prision plain and simple no pardon for treason
Pardon for what??? U retarded libtards said she didn’t do anything she says she didn’t do anything.. backwards friggen chowder heads what a joke ….
The problem is that means she’s guilty of something.
I think we will wait until obitch leaves before charging killary. Can’t pardon someone who isn’t charged. CYA!
It is not about retention of her rights. It is about public opinion if she were to run again.
They should wait till after Obama is gone and then bring up Clinton on charges. He will be gone and can’t do anything.
She would have to admit guilt….wont happen
That’s wrong. Ford pardoned Nixon with a blanket pardon for crimes he may have committed. He was never charged