Receiving a pardon is no doubt something that a person would receive with joy and gratitude. However, there can be a problem: Accepting a pardon does imply that you committed the crime for which you are being pardoned, right? If there were no crime committed, then the pardon wouldn’t make any sense.
Such is the problem in which Mrs. Clinton might well find herself. That she has another potential legal issue to contend with is certainly no surprise. In would be interesting to see just how much money the Clintons or their supporters have spent defending them all these decades. The figure must be staggering.
So with Obama in the waning days of his presidency handing out pardons with wild abandon, what of Hillary? More on page two.
I rember that slimmey Gerald Form
Good! Through her in jaIL AFTER oBAMA IS GONE!!!
Angel where have you been the last 8 years under a rock ? Your just a troll on here .
I remember Gerald Ford the half wit when asked by congress if he would pardon tricky$#%&!@*Nixon
My thoughts exactly.
She has to be charged and convicted before she can be pardoned
No that’s what liberals want she needs jail her involvement goes much deeper a care less than a black mark.
Why would anyone pardon someone who hasn’t done anything?
If she is pardoned she retains all her rights. She could hold public office again.
Sebastian Anthony Ilacqua according to the Constitution a pardon removes a conviction. Bill Clinton pardoned Marc Rich on his last day of office. Marc Rich was under indictment but wasn’t convicted because he ran off to Switzerland. Clinton started pardoning people that were never convicted. Mark rich also made a very large donation to The Clinton Foundation
she got down to 175