Receiving a pardon is no doubt something that a person would receive with joy and gratitude. However, there can be a problem: Accepting a pardon does imply that you committed the crime for which you are being pardoned, right? If there were no crime committed, then the pardon wouldn’t make any sense.
Such is the problem in which Mrs. Clinton might well find herself. That she has another potential legal issue to contend with is certainly no surprise. In would be interesting to see just how much money the Clintons or their supporters have spent defending them all these decades. The figure must be staggering.
So with Obama in the waning days of his presidency handing out pardons with wild abandon, what of Hillary? More on page two.
What did she do? Presidential pardon for losing a election?
Shows she is guilty like we already know
Gene Anderson for example?
Charged for what exactly?
Unfortunately he has plenty of time he has that damn auto pen. He pardoned 78 people from prison in one day alone
I’m sorry who has private servers, hillary and who else.
No. Pardon. Never. Ever. They All are done.
Only a judge and jury should be able to pardon anyone ! I know what the law is but it is wrong ,wrong , wrong !!!!
If he pardons her would he not also have to pardon Bill and Chelsea??
well im just a dumb$#%&!@*hillbilly but how do you pardon some one thats not been prosecuted of a crime thats like putting the cart before the horse!!!!