As the debate over President Trump’s immigration policy and initiatives grows, so does his apparent determination to see his campaign promises put into action. The left, as expected, is in a fit of self-righteous rage over the efforts being made to curtail illegal immigration and remove illegals from the US, especially those who have committed crimes. However, also as expected, Mr. Trump is not backing down in the face of such resistance to the enforcement of the law, but is doubling-down.
The possibility of federal over-reach is a concern, especially in matters of law enforcement. Most crimes are of a local nature, and as such are the proper responsibility of state and local law enforcement. Injecting federal authorities into local matters is seldom a good idea no matter how it appealing it might be at the time. Hence, those who love liberty should be concerned when they see anything that appears to move towards the federalization of the state and local police.
All of this said, we are in anything but a normal environment. Cities and states are in active rebellion against established federal laws regarding immigration, and are harboring illegals in an effort to thwart their deportation. It’s an outrageous situation, so it comes as little surprise that the solution being implemented is somewhat unconventional. More on page two.
We had 4 in our little town was catch breaking in a house. Call gov. They said no money to do something and say take to state line and kick out .had did that help.
so pull over any non white driver
Walt. It not only muslins it all illegal. He doing the job we voted him in. Bless Trump.
Federalizing our police force?
NO. NO AND NO!!! He can request that the governor of a state to call out the National Guard in the event of local or national emergency on US soil. The NG cannot be forced from the governor to fight on foreign shores. The US attorney general can wrest control ONLY if the governor becomes despotic and attempts to use the NG wrongfully against the citizens, other states or federal government installations, lawfully located within the states. (Occupied Ft. Sumpter was an example of an unlawfully occupied federal installation, for a reference)…
The Sheriff of any County can enforce local, state and federal law,already. A Sheriff has more power in his own jurisdiction than any meandering federal agent. Rid us of “sanctuary cities”, remove any elected officials trying to install one and let’s enforce the law without making new ones.
And it’s illegal for local liberal government to pick and choose what laws are enforced by them.
Citizens go to jail when they break laws, illegal aliens get a free pass and protection from these same liberal local governments.
Kate Brown of Oregon is one of the worse, our previous governor was impeached for corruption.
Kate brown was put in place by the same corrupt governor.
she wants to make Oregon a sanctuary state.
Might as well give the state to Mexico because illegal aliens have most of the jobs here.
PATHETIC
I dont give a rats$#%&!@*if pedro is the niceist guy in town and been your nieghbor for yrs If hes here ileagilly for how long And knew it yet just enjoyed the ride To bad See ya
The crime of seditious conspiracy is committed when two or more persons in any state or U.S. territory conspire to levy war against the U.S. government. A person commits the crime of advocating the violent overthrow of the federal government when she willfully advocates or teaches the overthrow of the government by force, publishes material that advocates the overthrow of the government by force, or organizes persons to overthrow the government by force. A person found guilty of seditious conspiracy or advocating the overthrow of the government may be fined and sentenced to up to 20 years in prison. States also maintain laws that punish similar advocacy and conspiracy against the state government.
We have lots of federal police now Atf Fbi ice and the list goes on But its local cops makeing arrest and holding those for the feds as it should be