The Third Amendment was created to protect your home from being quartered by soldiers without your consent. It has very rarely been a matter of debate or litigation, until now.
Federal district court Judge Andrew Gordon ruled that the police are exempt from the 3rd Amendment with a case out of Henderson, Nevada after a family had their home broken into and seized by local law enforcement who stated they needed the home to gain a “tactical advantage” against suspected criminals in a neighboring house.
Police actually forced their way into this family’s home, pepper-balled the father and his dog and then incarcerated the man for a day.
MOVE TO THE NEXT PAGE:
Sounds fishy to me.
The third amendment of our Cons$#%&!@*ution prohibits this without the owners consent, but now what does the Cons$#%&!@*ution mean under Obama.
I sure hope they are alll bulet proof, and I am not talking about useless body armour either cause I have rounds that will easily penetrate even the most state of the art kind as do many othere thatt i know very well
NOT MY HOUSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That is not a good solution… We should fight back by getting these type of people fired from their jobs…THEY WORK FOR US.
Amen to that!
… isn’t this part of what 1776 was all about … ?
about a year or so ago they were trying to p$#%&!@* a law that you basicly owned nothing you have. you wouldnt be allowed to sell anything you owned without the company that made its permission
Unfortunately it’s in the cons$#%&!@*ution.
They have there own agenda. And the betterment of the American people is not it.