The Democrats just never get tired of trying to promote gun control to gun owners and failing miserably. Of course, this is because many of them simply can’t relate to them, as was made painfully apparent this weekend.
Speaking at the NBC/Youtube Democratic debate on Sunday, former Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley defended his position on gun control by touting his relationship with gun owners. Attempting to defend his anti-Second Amendment record, O’Malley claimed that he’s, “never met a self-respecting deer hunter that needed an AR-15 to down a deer.”
Setting aside the unlikelihood of his claim that he regularly fraternizes with gun owners and deer hunters, O’Malley’s statement is stupefying. Yes, maybe deer hunters don’t need AR-15’s to shoot deer, but have you considered the possibility that maybe, just maybe, they need them to defend themselves?
To be fair, O’Malley, with his well-trained security escorts, probably doesn’t understand why anybody would need an AR-15 to protect themselves and their family. It should, however, keep him from opening his mouth on topics that he has little understanding of.
See more on the next page:
I think politicians are brainwashed by power and greed
308 is my favorite.
It is not about what I need. It is about what I can have
I never met a politician who was qualified to decide what I need or what I need it for.
ASSHOLE
2nd amendment NOT…NOT ABOUT DEER..ITS ABOUT YOU N GOVT. MORAN!
Really hellbent on disarming us aint they………wonder why??? Could it be that an unarmed public is much easier to control????
Citizens don’t need an AR-15’s to take down a deer. We need them to protect ourselves from Government tyranny.
The second ammendment. Was NOT written for hunters. It was written to protect Americans from a runaway govt. Just like we have right now. Why do you think Obama and Killary want our guns
DITTO..BRO. CB