The Democrats just never get tired of trying to promote gun control to gun owners and failing miserably. Of course, this is because many of them simply can’t relate to them, as was made painfully apparent this weekend.
Speaking at the NBC/Youtube Democratic debate on Sunday, former Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley defended his position on gun control by touting his relationship with gun owners. Attempting to defend his anti-Second Amendment record, O’Malley claimed that he’s, “never met a self-respecting deer hunter that needed an AR-15 to down a deer.”
Setting aside the unlikelihood of his claim that he regularly fraternizes with gun owners and deer hunters, O’Malley’s statement is stupefying. Yes, maybe deer hunters don’t need AR-15’s to shoot deer, but have you considered the possibility that maybe, just maybe, they need them to defend themselves?
To be fair, O’Malley, with his well-trained security escorts, probably doesn’t understand why anybody would need an AR-15 to protect themselves and their family. It should, however, keep him from opening his mouth on topics that he has little understanding of.
See more on the next page:
223 is a small are dumbass
The AR is for protecting ourselves from tyranny. If i was hunting with an AR, its because of their precision.
You haven’t met me.
I have never known a congressmen and women that are liberals like you either
If it works use it
It is not the government’s business what kind of gun I use for hunting I doubt very much if he’s ever went deer hunting because nobody would be this guy’s buddy anyway
Where in the 2A does it say “unless you dont need the firearm”
That is the best part of a firearm. If you have it and need it, its perfect. If you have it and dont need it its harmless.
Might not hunt with ar15 but it would come in handy for intruders and some of these Isis morons trying to come into our world
I like the poster that said no one needs a whinny little$#%&!@*yet here you are.
Their is so big deer out their,