The Democrats just never get tired of trying to promote gun control to gun owners and failing miserably. Of course, this is because many of them simply can’t relate to them, as was made painfully apparent this weekend.
Speaking at the NBC/Youtube Democratic debate on Sunday, former Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley defended his position on gun control by touting his relationship with gun owners. Attempting to defend his anti-Second Amendment record, O’Malley claimed that he’s, “never met a self-respecting deer hunter that needed an AR-15 to down a deer.”
Setting aside the unlikelihood of his claim that he regularly fraternizes with gun owners and deer hunters, O’Malley’s statement is stupefying. Yes, maybe deer hunters don’t need AR-15’s to shoot deer, but have you considered the possibility that maybe, just maybe, they need them to defend themselves?
To be fair, O’Malley, with his well-trained security escorts, probably doesn’t understand why anybody would need an AR-15 to protect themselves and their family. It should, however, keep him from opening his mouth on topics that he has little understanding of.
See more on the next page:
Who ?
“Shall not be Infringed” . End of Story! Boom!
It’s not about deer hunting
Are you familiar with the 300 “Blackout”? Does it work well for deer?
Loser
HUNTING is NOT the purpose of the 2nd Amendment you fool.
An AR15 isn’t for hunting deer, it’s for protecting the constitution.
The writers of the constitution warned us about this very thing. The language clearly communicates that the right to bear arms is not for hunting. It is to defend the way of life and government that the constitution founded from those whom they correctly predicted would try to change for the same reason governments always have. That is lay for money, power and enslavement of the human cattle it would require to keep the rich rich and the powerful powerful.
How stupid can an individual be liberalism at its best
Couldn’t agree more!