The Democrats just never get tired of trying to promote gun control to gun owners and failing miserably. Of course, this is because many of them simply can’t relate to them, as was made painfully apparent this weekend.
Speaking at the NBC/Youtube Democratic debate on Sunday, former Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley defended his position on gun control by touting his relationship with gun owners. Attempting to defend his anti-Second Amendment record, O’Malley claimed that he’s, “never met a self-respecting deer hunter that needed an AR-15 to down a deer.”
Setting aside the unlikelihood of his claim that he regularly fraternizes with gun owners and deer hunters, O’Malley’s statement is stupefying. Yes, maybe deer hunters don’t need AR-15’s to shoot deer, but have you considered the possibility that maybe, just maybe, they need them to defend themselves?
To be fair, O’Malley, with his well-trained security escorts, probably doesn’t understand why anybody would need an AR-15 to protect themselves and their family. It should, however, keep him from opening his mouth on topics that he has little understanding of.
See more on the next page:
We don’t need an ar to down a deer we need an ar to protect our Constitution and way of life from a government hell bent on making sheep out of everyone in this country
This has nothing to do with deer hunting and everything about the second, stop spinning the wrong b******t.
Do they think Americans don’t know what they are trying to do to us ! They think all we Americans are supposed to do is work. Give them our money and keep quiet !
Well I never met a self respecting politician either.
I don’t think people are talking about deer,look around you and you can see what they are talking about,,of course you probably live in a protected world.
What a complete$#%&!@*!!! The 2nd Amendment stands !!! So glad this dip$#%&!@*”Globalist” is out of the race !!!
besides, an Ar-15 cal. gun, with a wood stock not a “scary” black plastic one would be the same. how the hell do you guys get “good” guns and “bad”guns anyway. they are “OBJECTS” they cannot do ANYTHING alone!! so if I understand this, a car with a drunk is a “bad” car and a car without a drunk is a”good” car. OBJECTS CANNOT BE EITHER GOOD OR BAD they are THINGS!!
Excellent!!
You don’t seem to understand, the Second amendment is not about hunting, O’malley. And it sounds like you have met few deer hunters.
45 cal.self defense round works well in house to stop deer.