The Democrats just never get tired of trying to promote gun control to gun owners and failing miserably. Of course, this is because many of them simply can’t relate to them, as was made painfully apparent this weekend.
Speaking at the NBC/Youtube Democratic debate on Sunday, former Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley defended his position on gun control by touting his relationship with gun owners. Attempting to defend his anti-Second Amendment record, O’Malley claimed that he’s, “never met a self-respecting deer hunter that needed an AR-15 to down a deer.”
Setting aside the unlikelihood of his claim that he regularly fraternizes with gun owners and deer hunters, O’Malley’s statement is stupefying. Yes, maybe deer hunters don’t need AR-15’s to shoot deer, but have you considered the possibility that maybe, just maybe, they need them to defend themselves?
To be fair, O’Malley, with his well-trained security escorts, probably doesn’t understand why anybody would need an AR-15 to protect themselves and their family. It should, however, keep him from opening his mouth on topics that he has little understanding of.
See more on the next page:
And .300 Blackout is ideal.
Ok so here is the ” deer hunting” excuse again. Quit using it. But if I want to shoot a deer with my AR .223 them I will. What if I had .223 deer rifle world that be ok?
When were we just talking about deer hunting or any other hunting since we have guns..Sure not the only reason we have them!
idiots
for shitheads who cant shoot
If you need to unarmed a public in order to govern, your not much of a governor.
My deer rifle is much more powerful than my AR15 so what’s your point jerk!
And i never knew the government to shoot down its citizens till oboma
Its for a corrupt government like we have now
Neither have I….don’t think they’re bought for killing deer bright boy…me thinks there’s a reason for you being # 3…in a field of three…although the other two aren’t far ahead of you…intellectually.