In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Dis Bar her
What she does not know is that she is bound to uphold the Cons$#%&!@*ution. She made that statement when she was sworn in. What is next? Will she deny the prosecution to try the case with evidence that shows the perpetrator is guilty? I see trouble in the future for this court.
I’m pretty sure that isn’t even legal. Lol. How can you ban the Law in the courtroom? Lol
Its the supreme law of the land i would say time for her to find a new job
Guess time to remove this jusge
then I still say that she should be REMOVE from the Courts.
Judges are appointed, they don’t remain on the bench as a guaranteed position. They can also be removed from the bench. Time to do exactly that.
Wtf?
Which way does the water circle when the the toilet is flushed? That is the direction this country is headed. …down the toilet
Ummmm, then how do I plead the 5th