Barack Obama is going to make a move on tightening gun restrictions after the holiday season ends. That’s what senior congressional aides and some in the gun-control community are promising will happen after the President returns from a holiday vacation in Hawaii in January.
The San Bernardino shooting prompted a legal review of the current gun control laws, “scrubbing through the law” as White House Press Secretary, Josh Earnest, put it. Ostensibly, the review is to help Obama find ways to limit weapon access to terrorists and future potential mass shooters, but the fallout of any executive action will inevitably limit every citizen’s access to firearms.
While it is currently uncertain what the President can realistically impose as far as gun control, both sides in the capitol believe, as one senior house GOP leadership aide put it, “something is brewing on guns.” As the New Hampshire primaries approach, Obama will do everything he can to shore up support among establishment Democrats, including affecting seriously harmful executive impositions on citizens’ rights.
Find out more about what to expect on gun control on page 2.
Communist…shame on EVERY DEMOCRATE…each one of you are guilty of treason electing this imposter
He is the reason for the second ammendment
Bush was just as bad. Constant war, lack of civil rights.
The Cloward-Piven aka “Coward Proven” strategy is based on the teachings of Saul Alinsky a communist socialist died about 43 years ago, but his writings have influenced the politicians who control our nation today.
Hillary Clinton did a college thesis on his writings and Barack Hussein Obama writes about him in his books.
Died: June 12, 1972,
Carmel-by-the-Sea, Ca
Education: University of Chicago
Spouse: Irene Alinsky.
Books:
Rules for Liberal Radicals
Reveille for Radicals
Anyone think this stuff isn’t happening today in the U.S. ?
All eight rules are currently in play.
There are eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a Liberal Socialist state.
The first is the most important.
1) Healthcare: Control healthcare and you control the people.
DONE.
2) Poverty: Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
DONE.
3) Debt: Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
DONE.
4) Gun Control: Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
WORKING ON IT.
5) Welfare: Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).
DONE.
6) Education: Take control of what people read and listen to. Take control of what children learn in school.
DONE.
7) Religion: Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
DONE.
8) Class Warfare: Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
DONE.
Any of this sound like what is happening to the United States?
Alinsky simplified Vladimir Lenin’s original scheme for world conquest by communism, under Russian rule.
Stalin described his converts as “Useful Idiots.”
The “Useful” Liberal Idiots have destroyed every nation in which they have seized power and control. It’s presently happening at an alarming rate in the U.S.
If people can read this and still say everything is just fine. They’re the useful idiots. “It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.”
Hillary Clinton a liberal Socialist is running for office! She is backed by George Soros a Communist Socialist who backs and controls the Devout Muslim, “Barack Hussein Obama”…
…get it together-ignore this dumbass- The supreme Court on International Treaty v. Constitution
“It would be manifestly contrary to the objectives of those who created the Constitution, as well as those who were responsible for the Bill of Rights—let alone alien to our entire constitutional history and tradition—to construe Article VI as permitting the United States to exercise power under an international agreement without observing constitutional prohibitions.
[THIS ALSO APPLIES TO “EXECUTIVE ORDERS”]
In effect, such construction would permit amendment of that document in a manner not sanctioned by Article V. THE PROHIBITIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION WERE DESIGNED TO APPLY TO ALL BRANCHES OF THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT AND THEY CANNOT BE NULLIFIED BY THE EXECUTIVE OR BY THE EXECUTIVE AND THE SENATE COMBINED”. Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 16 (1957)
The Second Amendment – U S supreme Court
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful purposes in federal enclaves, such as self-defense within the home. The decision did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment extends beyond federal enclaves to the states,[1] which was addressed later by McDonald v. Chicago (2010). It was the first Supreme Court case in United States history to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms.
McDonald v. Chicago, 130 S. Ct. 3020 (2010), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that determined whether the Second Amendment applies to the individual states. The Court held that the right of an individual to “keep and bear arms” protected by the Second Amendment is incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and applies to the states. The decision cleared up the uncertainty left in the wake of District of Columbia v. Heller as to the scope of gun rights in regard to the states.
Congress do your jobs, or start looking for new ones.
…both parties, democrat and republican, are like a flock of geese – they wake up on new pond every day…need to get over it – the government needs you – you do not need the government…an•ar•chy ˈanərkē/ noun: anarchy
ANARCHY AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO DESPOTISM AND TYRANNY
Absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual
-regarded as a political ideal.
Anarchists are not people who blow up bombs or pretend to be$#%&!@*just for attention or to make people pissed. They are not all obnoxious 12 year olds who hate their parents. They’re not people who draw A’s on their hands and on signs for attention.
¶What they are: People who believe that individuals should have the freedom to actually run their own lives without someone making their decisions for them. The only reason most of them vote is because, if people are going to be so dumb as not to give their ideas any thought, then they might as well have what little say in their lives as they are allowed. What most people see as anarchists is just the stereotype people have developed due to some idiots who decided that anarchy should be a fad.
¶There is no sure way to tell if anarchy will work or not because people are so closed-minded, that they won’t even give it any thought.
¶ Of course we need something to stop crime but the government, as it has proven many times, sure isn’t it. Anarchist’s think you should actually be living your life instead of having some figurehead run it for you.
Obama would have been a slave and unable to vote when our foundering fathers said all men are created equal. Now we have him in the White House. Oh, how far backward have we gone. //sarcasm.
He is EXACTLY what our forefathers warned us about only worse…IMHO
None of this will hold up in the courts. He’s just a wimpy little boy.