Let’s forget the fact that John Hopkins University has, after careful research and scientific analysis, taken a stand not to do sexual reassignment surgeries because it was found not to be beneficial for the patient.
Yet, the Obama administration seems to think it has all knowledge, of all subjects, and therefore can make the leap that to have more coverage in Obamacare for transgenders is most prudent.
Medical science has demonstrated that reassignment is not best for a patient, yet we the tax payer must ante up and will be helping cover more “health procedures sought by the transgendered.”
Should you pay for a sexual reassignment surgery for a 14-year-old girl who has much to learn about the world?
Continue on the following page:
NO
I think Obama should pay for all of it. Deduct it’s cost from his pay or retirement pay. When it runs out each year, no more operations.
David Stadler said it all.
Agreed. If p$#%&!@*ed we should also pay for women who need breast reductions.
Both asinine!
Lost in space
no
I swear this president is mentally disturbed… how can he be president??
Wrong
just f****** stupid!
No way