Let’s forget the fact that John Hopkins University has, after careful research and scientific analysis, taken a stand not to do sexual reassignment surgeries because it was found not to be beneficial for the patient.
Yet, the Obama administration seems to think it has all knowledge, of all subjects, and therefore can make the leap that to have more coverage in Obamacare for transgenders is most prudent.
Medical science has demonstrated that reassignment is not best for a patient, yet we the tax payer must ante up and will be helping cover more “health procedures sought by the transgendered.”
Should you pay for a sexual reassignment surgery for a 14-year-old girl who has much to learn about the world?
Continue on the following page:
trying to tell us something Obama? lol
Jennifer, the girls were adopted in Morraco. Neither child is theirs. Michelle IS a man, Obuma is gay. What bothers me is: Why does Obuma hide his being gay? Is he ashamed of it.? Michelle-Michael is a MAN. Why does HE hide it? Ashamed, I would think !
FU!!!!
No. Transgender surgeries are not health related. That is a personal choice. The insurance companies will be real quick to tell you that. When they reach legal adult age, then that is their choice. But they pay for it. Not the taxpayers.
Hell NO!!! That surgery is not a necessity. She can finish growing up, get a job and insurance and pay for it herself. We should not have to pay for anyone’s medical care other than our own.
Nothing against trans people by any means, but I do not believe that American tax payers should have to foot the bill. If I was trans, I would not expect anyone to pay for my surgery except for me.
Does this mean they’re gonna cover a cis woman’s $#%&!@* job now?
It’s not medically necessary, you want to cut your junk off you pay for it
(Anthony Pirozzi)
no
No!