Let’s forget the fact that John Hopkins University has, after careful research and scientific analysis, taken a stand not to do sexual reassignment surgeries because it was found not to be beneficial for the patient.
Yet, the Obama administration seems to think it has all knowledge, of all subjects, and therefore can make the leap that to have more coverage in Obamacare for transgenders is most prudent.
Medical science has demonstrated that reassignment is not best for a patient, yet we the tax payer must ante up and will be helping cover more “health procedures sought by the transgendered.”
Should you pay for a sexual reassignment surgery for a 14-year-old girl who has much to learn about the world?
Continue on the following page:
taxpayers should not pay for transgender surgery. That is an optional surgery and the person having it done should pay the entire amount out of pocket, that goes for people in prison also.
GO TO HELL !!!
That’s because he wonts one for when him and Al Sharpton get married.
Hell No!! We already pay for their housing, food, cable, education… Enough is enough!!!!!
No
It is insanity, sick that any law maker would allow, much less promote, & empower children to make life changing alterations to their bodies, & futures, & abilities to have children before they 21.
It is sad & sick enough that no one is listening to transgenders who have regretted the surgeries or to psychological professionals who have explained this is a mental illness which would be better treated in other ways.
What a horrible notion that any leader should declare such a rape of childrens lives clothed in the guise of liberty.
this guy face angers me so much. traitor and a very evil one at that
Liberals, Let us know when you’ve had enough of Obama’s lies and incompetence!
No. Does government pay for breast enhancements? Both are choices, not medical necessities.
Say what? With whose money?