Let’s forget the fact that John Hopkins University has, after careful research and scientific analysis, taken a stand not to do sexual reassignment surgeries because it was found not to be beneficial for the patient.
Yet, the Obama administration seems to think it has all knowledge, of all subjects, and therefore can make the leap that to have more coverage in Obamacare for transgenders is most prudent.
Medical science has demonstrated that reassignment is not best for a patient, yet we the tax payer must ante up and will be helping cover more “health procedures sought by the transgendered.”
Should you pay for a sexual reassignment surgery for a 14-year-old girl who has much to learn about the world?
Continue on the following page:
Bs!
ell no!!!!!
He’ll no.
Another stupid too
Had enough yet
Yikes, I don’t think anyone should have sexual re$#%&!@*ignment surgery until they are a consenting adult.
NO WAY!
Lol…
I am against all of the perversions connected to this, what is next marriage between close relatives, marriages between different species, pre $#%&!@*rty sex changes. Just because American have accepted perversion in the white house and we have a trans gender first lady and a $#%&!@*sexual president we can still draw the line somewhere, right. I agree with Rachel Marie Shell. Any lies told in putting Obamacare into effect should open it to a new vote.
He needs to have his head examed.