Let’s forget the fact that John Hopkins University has, after careful research and scientific analysis, taken a stand not to do sexual reassignment surgeries because it was found not to be beneficial for the patient.
Yet, the Obama administration seems to think it has all knowledge, of all subjects, and therefore can make the leap that to have more coverage in Obamacare for transgenders is most prudent.
Medical science has demonstrated that reassignment is not best for a patient, yet we the tax payer must ante up and will be helping cover more “health procedures sought by the transgendered.”
Should you pay for a sexual reassignment surgery for a 14-year-old girl who has much to learn about the world?
Continue on the following page:
Ohhh cheap gas Tim Brundage, so explain to me and other veterans how our claims get processed more effeciently, and not to mention get taken care of better at the clinics and hospitals for our needs…..js
Not
Wtf. They are children they haven’t a clue what they what would he let his own daughter do it, a women can’t get her tube tied as an adult , until she has kids or is a in her late twenty but a child can change their body for good.. wtf
Wow! Liberal benevolence has no bounds!!!!!! (Sarcasm!)
Absolutely no!
No are we trying to take the place of God.
Shouldn’t pay for any freak surgeries with tax dollars regardless of age
This is wrong
Can we start by castrating Obama?
Hell no