Let’s forget the fact that John Hopkins University has, after careful research and scientific analysis, taken a stand not to do sexual reassignment surgeries because it was found not to be beneficial for the patient.
Yet, the Obama administration seems to think it has all knowledge, of all subjects, and therefore can make the leap that to have more coverage in Obamacare for transgenders is most prudent.
Medical science has demonstrated that reassignment is not best for a patient, yet we the tax payer must ante up and will be helping cover more “health procedures sought by the transgendered.”
Should you pay for a sexual reassignment surgery for a 14-year-old girl who has much to learn about the world?
Continue on the following page:
No
But yet allows an ins company to charge a person with pre existing conditions an astronomical rate for a premium. And they call it the affordable car act… Get real. Costs are way higher than before
Idiot!
Unbelievable !
We didn’t pay for your wife/boyfriends re$#%&!@*ignment surgery
No. When they are 18 they can make that decision and pay for it on their own.
Is he coming out?
I would rather put that towards dental work
I agree!
I would gladly agree to pay taxpayer money to get these individuals mental health services. All liberrals need this.