Let’s forget the fact that John Hopkins University has, after careful research and scientific analysis, taken a stand not to do sexual reassignment surgeries because it was found not to be beneficial for the patient.
Yet, the Obama administration seems to think it has all knowledge, of all subjects, and therefore can make the leap that to have more coverage in Obamacare for transgenders is most prudent.
Medical science has demonstrated that reassignment is not best for a patient, yet we the tax payer must ante up and will be helping cover more “health procedures sought by the transgendered.”
Should you pay for a sexual reassignment surgery for a 14-year-old girl who has much to learn about the world?
Continue on the following page:
No well wait can I get a $#%&!@* job then it’s ok
What are you going to do in 10 years when it wants to switch back
Absolutely not. People aren’t right in their heads until they are at least 30, and sometimes later.
The law to mutilate a child because they want to be??
No
No. We said NO. GET IT?
Sickning
Only if someone is truly disfigured.
Give her back her job!!!!
First let her see the world experience the world then if she still wants re$#%&!@*ignment surgery then fine get it but she or her parents should have to pay for it not American tax dollars