Let’s forget the fact that John Hopkins University has, after careful research and scientific analysis, taken a stand not to do sexual reassignment surgeries because it was found not to be beneficial for the patient.
Yet, the Obama administration seems to think it has all knowledge, of all subjects, and therefore can make the leap that to have more coverage in Obamacare for transgenders is most prudent.
Medical science has demonstrated that reassignment is not best for a patient, yet we the tax payer must ante up and will be helping cover more “health procedures sought by the transgendered.”
Should you pay for a sexual reassignment surgery for a 14-year-old girl who has much to learn about the world?
Continue on the following page:
Because his partner Michael needs to get its surgeries finished.
Never.
how about just paying for the people with cancer and other terminal illnesses. The rest is just fluff.
Umm I count that has cosmetic surgery. They should pay their own surgery.
No. There are uther things not cover that are life threatening
Really? How bout pay for children w cleft pallets , old people that need dentures or insulin . This Hocus Pocus , kookie nonsense needs to end
Hell NO
I guess $#%&!@*ies for 12 yr olds too . Danged pedophiles
no
hell nooooooooooooo