Let’s forget the fact that John Hopkins University has, after careful research and scientific analysis, taken a stand not to do sexual reassignment surgeries because it was found not to be beneficial for the patient.
Yet, the Obama administration seems to think it has all knowledge, of all subjects, and therefore can make the leap that to have more coverage in Obamacare for transgenders is most prudent.
Medical science has demonstrated that reassignment is not best for a patient, yet we the tax payer must ante up and will be helping cover more “health procedures sought by the transgendered.”
Should you pay for a sexual reassignment surgery for a 14-year-old girl who has much to learn about the world?
Continue on the following page:
Unbelievable ! That’s Obamacare !
My first thought would have gotten me in a lot of trouble, so, I’ll just say, TAXPAYERS DO NOT NEED TO PAY FOR SOMEONE ELSES TRANSGENDER SURGERY. If you want the surgery, that is your choice, and YOUR RESPONSIB ILITY. No freeloading.
NO, NO, NO!!! they should pay for their own surgeries, WE HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH IT
NO
ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY NO WAY!!!
Taxpayers should not have to pay for this !!!!!!!!
These young people have no idea what the ramification of sexual re$#%&!@*ignment and what confusion it may cause their lives. So sad.
Oh hell no. Its bad enough i pay such high taxes to fund welfare.
Obama, you sir are a POS! you can come arrest me if you think that I’ll pay for a transgender surgery! Go to hell Mr. President and burn there where you belong! You are the anti-Christ!
Well it worked for Barry. Oh by the way, did you all know he had sex with a limousine driver once. The driver took 3 independent polygraph tests and p$#%&!@*ed all three. I believe it; don’t care if anyone else does. He acts gay. No offense to my gay friends and relatives. 2 of them agree with my perception also. If your gay your gay, Don’t matter, but don’t be a hypocrite your choice affects other people’s lives.