Ever the globalist, Obama has turned to the United Nations to help implement some of his most coveted gun control measures in the form of the organization’s Arms Trade Treaty. The treaty, which was signed by Secretary of State John Kerry back in 2013, commits the US to the UN’s plan to require signatory nations to maintain “national control systems” for firearms. In short, it mandates that governments around the world create the kind of gun registries envisioned by Obama and his fellow supporters.
There’s one problem with Obama’s scheme though: it’s completely illegal. Not only does the Constitution explicitly guarantee Americans the right to bear arms, but the Senate has yet to vote on the treaty, meaning that it is not legally-binding in the eyes of the US.
Read more on the next page:
‘IF IT’S HILLARY CLINTON IT’S WAR,’ SAYS VLADIMIR PUTIN TO FRIGHTENED RUSSIAN PEOPLE
JUNE 20, 2016
Kim McLendon
Hillary Clinton brings the real threat of war, not Donald Trump, according to Vladimir Putin, as election news has Russia gearing up for a possible attack. Hillary’s image as a war hawk is lost on mainstream American voters, but Russia, Europe, and other nations saw a not-so-warm-and-fuzzy side of Hillary when she was Secretary of State, and the contents of Mrs. Clinton’s intercepted emails has not served to soothe their fears…
Vladimir Putin’s open concerns about Hillary Clinton have put Russians and Romanians under a lot of stress. Putin was encouraged by Donald Trump’s message that he was willing to work with Russian leaders, but as the FBI drag their feet on what Russians know should be an indictment of Mrs. Clinton, tensions continue to rise…
Ironically, Hillary Clinton’s war hawk ways have the Russian public scared to death in a very specific way, and the Kremlin is gearing up for what it perceives as an unwanted but inevitable war with Hillary. Putin doesn’t say Hillary is thin-skinned — he says she’s Satan incarnate…
Hillary Clinton is Satan to the Russian People, according to the Observer, while they see at least a ray of hope in Donald Trump…
Vladimir Putin has ordered the Aerospace Defense Forces to accelerate the deployment of two or more missile attack early warning system satellites. He told his military leaders to prepare for imminent war if Hillary is elected according to ETF.
“If it’s Hillary Clinton, it’s war.”
Barack Obama already has Romania and Russia terrorized with his new missile system, which was completed just last week, according to ETF. Some online commentators claim the European Phased Adaptive Approach missile system could reduce all Romania to ruins. The New York Times reports that the placing of these missiles increases the risk of nuclear war and directly threatened Russia even though Obama claims they will be aimed at Iran.
Because he is afraid. He has done nothing right so he thinks this would be a good thing to do. I don’t think he could get to through the Congress in the short time he has left.
No.
In fact, Islam is an unrepentant politico-expansionist movement clothed in the trappings of religion and bent on universal conquest by whatever means it can mobilize: deception (taqiyya), social and cultural infiltration, or bloody violence, as its millennial history and authoritative scriptures have proven. (See Koran 13:41, which is meant literally despite the attempt of apologists to launder its purport: “Do they not see that We are advancing in the land, diminishing it by its borders on all sides?”)
There are several ways in which Islam differs from all other major religions. For starters:
SPONSORED
It sanctions militant proselytization, mandating forcible imposition on other peoples by coercion, threat and overt violence (Koran 8:39, 9:29, etc.), a practice unique among religions today.
It punishes apostasy with death (Koran 4:89; Hadith, Bukhari 9.84.57), also a practice unique among religions today.
It countenances no separation between church and state, that is, it cannot render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s. The scope of its ambition is khilafil, that is, the establishment of a Caliphate requiring that a state—ultimately a universal state—be ruled by Islamic law. As Muslim scholar Jaafar Sheikh Idris explains, “Secularism cannot be a solution for countries with a Muslim majority or even a sizeable minority, for it requires people to replace their God-given beliefs with an entirely different set of man-made beliefs. Separation of religion and state is not an option for Muslims because it requires us to abandon Allah’s decree for that of man.”
The “religion” itself takes precedence over the transcendent values it should strive to attain: the flourishing of the individual soul, the love of God’s Creation, the grace and miracle of life, the conversation with the Divine, freedom of conscience and the inviolability of personal choice in determining one’s redemption. Instead, it elevates conformity to a set of stringent rules, down to the smallest detail, as a prerequisite to salvation, whose effect is primarily to perpetuate the faith itself at the expense of the individual votary. Admittedly, this is a literalist practice common to most restrictive and comparatively minor orthodoxies, but regarding the massive following enjoyed by Islam and its susceptibility to violence and the subjugation of other faiths and peoples to its hegemony, we are remarking a radically greater economy of scale and the havoc it can wreak.
The propensity to violence is not an aberration but an intrinsic element of the Islamic corpus. As Lee Cary has written, Islamic terrorists are “legacy, Koranic literalists” who use terror “to enforce a dogma that defines behavioral practices that comply with the Koran and [defines] the regulations of daily life.” The much-bruited notion that there is such a thing as “Islamism,” a form of extremism that has nothing to do with Islam proper, or is a perversion thereof, is a pure canard, another in a series of timorous progressivist memes bleaching the blood out of the Islamic ideological jalabiyya. Islam, not “Islamism,” promises paradise for martyrs and jihadis killed in battle (Koran 3: 157), thus palliating and even inciting feral attitudes and fanatical actions—a patently non-spiritual way of earning beatitude.
As Howard Kainz points out in an illuminating essay, “Islam and the Decalogue,” Islam reverses the Golden Rule, which is central to Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism and Confucianism (Koran 48:29, 2:191, 3:28, etc.). For this reason, Kainz concludes, “Islam may best be understood,” not as a religion, but “as a world-wide cult.”
The standard rebuttal that all faiths have at one time or another shown themselves prone to violence and repression misses the essential point. All the major religions have reformed themselves, reducing or eliminating the all-too-human tendency to sanctimonious oppression—and none of these faiths, let us remember, endorsed oppression as a universal creedal or Divine imperative. Such is not the case with Islam, a communion that since its inception in the 7th century has seldom strayed from its sanguinary path of carnage and subdual. Its incendiary prescriptions and commands, as many scholars have noted, are open-ended and contain no “sunset clause.” They are perpetual and mandatory, feeding what essayist Bill Kassel calls “religious-themed barbarism.”
If they fold on this they all should be charged with treason
get out of the in now
In your wet dream while fucking a goat
Hell no tell him to go to hell with the rest of his Muslim frends
Phuque him.
no UN in our country ever