White House spokesman Josh Earnest said during a press conference yesterday that Obama is preparing to take executive action on gun control, stating “The President’s goal is to look for opportunities to act administratively, unilaterally using his executive authority to try to make our communities safer,” Earnest said. “We’re always looking for those opportunities. But none of those opportunities when they present themselves is going to be an acceptable substitute for robust legislative action.”
More Page 2:
Just try and take our guns away You Mother Effer! We’re law abiding citizens, something the President wouldn’t know anything about and we have the Right to bear arms and protect ourselves. $#%&!@*ing Hitler did this and look what happened. Not going to happen in America!!! The people are getting fed up! If a civil war happens in our backyard, so be it.
We better be ready because here it comes.
2nd Amendment: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
…shall not be infringed. That means that the current laws and any attempt to make a law taking the right to bear arms away from the people is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!!
I am ashamed… of this president (small p intended).
Communist!
Well none of his executive orders will change anything! Look at sandy hook that douche bag kill someone stole their guns and then went on his Lil rampage and none of Obamas executive orders the first time around would have changed that now look at where most of the current shootings have taken place they have passed laws that mirror Obama’s executive orders and it still an it work in so if you want to stop the shootings QUIT giving these ppl 15 minutes of fame and the lil childish a holes will move on but the media puts the criminals on the front page for months and months and months
Go smoke a bolony pony
People, when are we going to be angry enough to drag this treasonous fool out of the White House and slam dunk him head first against the back wall of the nearest jail cell??
This POS needs to be GONE b4 he does his job any more
Obama must simply be arrested and prosecuted for impersonating a public officer. This can be done in Washington DC without involving Congress. Obama is in fact not allowed to be impeached.
The fact is that Obama is illegitimate and any attempt to impeach him would be an unlawful attempt to validate his “presidency” — nothing can be done to validate him as “the President,” so he cannot be lawfully impeached. I don’t know if Michelle Bachmann is trying to open up discussion in Congress about whether Obama is a usurper, or if she is trying to validate his “presidency” and “laws,” “executive orders” and “appointments” he has signed, all of which are in fact void ab initio. If the House of Representatives unlawfully impeaches Obama, then they will also say that everything Obama has signed is legal. If the House acknowledges that Obama is a usurper and therefore cannot be impeached, they will for the first time be formally acknowledging the fact that Obama has usurped the Office of the President.
NOTE: Congress has been avoiding the word “usurper,” because they knew he was ineligible in 2008 and 2012 when they counted the electoral votes without objecting to his ineligibility. For the members of Congress to come to the conclusion now that Obama is a usurper would be like putting the rope around their own necks. So, I doubt that they will change direction now. I believe that if they unlawfully try to impeach Obama it will not be for usurpation, but some other reason. They want the American people to think they are working for and representing them, when in fact they are avoiding the fact that Obama is a usurper and therefore willfully violating our representative form of government. Has anyone here read the articles of impeachment filed by Michelle Bachmann? Is usurpation mentioned in the articles? Probably not.
Our Constitution specifically provides that a president can be impeached. It does NOT provide for the impeachment of a usurper. Obviously a usurper is NOT a president. Dr. Vieira in Thought Must Precede Action states:
“Although Mr. Obama may have succeeded in gaining physical access to the office-space a legitimate President of the United States occupies in the White House, he never acquired legal access to “the Office of President,” because, not being “a natural born Citizen,” he was never constitutionally eligible, and is not now eligible, for that “Office”. For Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution declares (in pertinent part) that “[n]o Person except a natural born Citizen * * * shall be eligible to the Office of President”. If words have any meaning, a “Person” whom the supreme law of the land declares not to be “eligible to the Office of President” can never “gain access to” that “Office” in the sense of legally holding it or asserting any claim to it.”
http://ofthehighest.wordpress.com/2014/06/11/obama-must-simply-be-arrested-and-prosecuted-for-impersonating-a-public-officer-this-can-be-done-in-washington-dc-without-the-involvement-of-congress-obama-is-in-fact-not-allowed/
HIS EXECUTIVE ORDERS ARE BULL$#%&!@*…. HE CANNOT $#%&!@*ING LEGISLATE TO US… $#%&!@* HIM AND HIS EXECUTIVE ORDERS… HE NEEDS TO BE TAKEN DOWN