Can’t get enough info on clock boy? First, we must tell you the whole debacle of this anti-American family has reached new heights of nonsense. Second, if the following story was not absolutely true and is easily proved, you would not believe it, nor believe the latest in clock boys exploits.
Ahmed, the clock boy has returned from his tour of the Islamic theocracies ISIS prefers the most. Originally, his father an immigrant from the Sudan, migrated in the 1980’s, he drove taxi’s, delivered pizza’s and finally was able to own his own taxi company Jet Taxi.
The family is known as panderers, attempting in different ways to cash in on their anti-American claims, the whole race/terrorist card and finally succeeded with taking the guts out of a clock and putting it into a pencil box.
On their return, they were received at the White House, guests of Obama. So one would think this is the end of the clock boy hoax story. Wrong. So much has happened surrounding this nonsense, yet it seems to continue. And you won’t believe what else has happened to Ahmed, the clock boy.
more on clock boy’s celebrity next page
i am so glad that this muslim family are leaving our country..good bye!!
Toro, actually this country was founded on Christian beliefs as most all of the founders were Christian. Notice that it was these Christians, who received God’s word that mankind freely choose from among all options, such as life or death, who founded this nation with the founding principle that the people of this nation have the free will to choose their faith.
Islam does not acknowledge this concept, certainly not in the Koran, how can they be worshiping the same “one and only true God”? Where in the world have people of Islam made this a guiding principle of their nation? Certainly it wasn’t here, and if you poll the Muslims here they will tell you that they would rather have Sharia Law here. Why should we trust that Sharia is not their goal?
http://www.adherents.com/gov/Founding_Fathers_Religion.html
Enumerating the Founding Fathers
The three major foundational documents of the United States of America are the Declaration of Independence (July 1776), the Articles of Confederation (drafted 1777, ratified 1781) and the Constitution of the United States of America (1789). There are a total of 143 signatures on these documents, representing 118 different signers. (Some individuals signed more than one document.)
There were 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence. There were 48 signers of the Articles of Confederation. All 55 delegates who participated in the Constitutional Convention of 1787 are regarded as Founding Fathers, in fact, they are often regarded as the Founding Fathers because it is this group that actually debated, drafted and signed the U.S. Constitution, which is the basis for the country’s political and legal system. Only 39 delegates actually signed the document, however, meaning there were 16 non-signing delegates – individuals who were Constitutional Convention delegates but were not signers of the Constitution.
There were 95 Senators and Representatives in the First Federal Congress. If one combines the total number of signatures on the Declaration, the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution with the non-signing Constitutional Convention delegates, and then adds to that sum the number of congressmen in the First Federal Congress, one obtains a total of 238 “slots” or “positions” in these groups which one can classify as “Founding Fathers” of the United States. Because 40 individuals had multiple roles (they signed multiple documents and/or also served in the First Federal Congress), there are 204 unique individuals in this group of “Founding Fathers.” These are the people who did one or more of the following:
– signed the Declaration of Independence
– signed the Articles of Confederation
– attended the Constitutional Convention of 1787
– signed the Constitution of the United States of America
– served as Senators in the First Federal Congress (1789-1791)
– served as U.S. Representatives in the First Federal Congress
NOTES [about the image below referred to as the table above]: The table above counts people and not “roles,” meaning that individuals have not been counted multiple times if they appear on more than one of the lists above. Roger Sherman, for example, signed all three foundational documents and he was a Representative in the First Federal Congress, but he has been counted only once.
In the table above, some people have been counted more than once because they changed religious affiliation from one denomination to another. Thus, the individual amounts added together total more than 100%. This method is used because it results in accurate numbers for each individual religious affiliation. For example, a total of 7 Quakers are shown in the table above. There were indeed 7 Quakers who were in this group. (However, not all of these were life-long Quakers.) For the most part, very few Founding Fathers switched denomination during their lifetime (less than 8%), so double-counting has occurred only rarely in this table. Quakers, in fact, are more likely to have switched denominations than members of any other religious denomination. Along with taking up arms and supporting military action against the British, a large proportion of Quaker Founding Father officially renounced or were expelled from the ardently pacifistic denomination they had been raised in and joined another denomination (usually Episcopalianism).
Also, note that the proportions shown (percentage of each religious affiliation out of the total group of Founding Fathers) is the proportion out of Founders whose religious affiliation is known. The religious affiliation of a significant number of signers of the Articles of Confederation is not known, but if that information was available, it is expected that such information would not change the overall proportions significantly.
yes we are
and for you Obama F U
Yes, Yes I am.
and whats your point?
I think Angel Toro will believe whatever the Left inculcates to him. Even though he knows that Islam has made conquest of other nations the goal of Islam, admitting that the Crusades were a response to Islam, to take lands back and stop the ill treatment of Christians, he denies what he has just admitted. Why does Islam so thoroughly seek to destroy the faith of those they conquest that they build mosques atop the former holy sites of those they conquer, thus destroying any symbolism that might give hope to the conquered?
Looks like someone got it right.
that was the whole reason for this little sand$#%&!@* pull the ‘race’ card (muslims are not a race by the way) and now the Ofuhrer wont have to make executive actions when the country is so worried about not being called some kind of prejudice he will be able to do whatever his tiny shriveled heart desires. thats for islam to rule the world
No, just Anti-Muslim.